WorkingMethod: Difference between revisions

From Pl@ntUse
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{title | text = The working method | color = purple | image = Text-x-generic_with_pencil-2.svg}}
{{title | text = The working method | color = purple | image = Text-x-generic_with_pencil-2.svg}}
It is of course scalable and open for discussion. But the basic idea is not to produce consensus summaries. It is rather to provide solid material to allow everyone to make their own synthesis. A priority is to upload the body of data that underlie the work, but are rarely published, forcing everyone to start from scratch.
It is of course scalable and open for discussion. But the basic idea is not to produce consensus summaries. It is rather to provide solid material to allow everyone to make his/her own synthesis. A priority is to upload the body of data that underlie the work, but are rarely published, forcing everyone to start from scratch.


As is customary in the scientific community, we mention the author of each contribution. However, most of the contributions may be corrected or updated, since it will make consensus. See [[Help: Authors contributions]]
As is customary in the scientific community, we mention the author of each contribution. However, most of the contributions may be corrected or updated, as far as they reach consensus. See [[Help: Authors contributions]]

Revision as of 12:21, 27 July 2011

The working method

It is of course scalable and open for discussion. But the basic idea is not to produce consensus summaries. It is rather to provide solid material to allow everyone to make his/her own synthesis. A priority is to upload the body of data that underlie the work, but are rarely published, forcing everyone to start from scratch.

As is customary in the scientific community, we mention the author of each contribution. However, most of the contributions may be corrected or updated, as far as they reach consensus. See Help: Authors contributions