Iconography: Difference between revisions

From Pl@ntUse
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


More images are to be found in other categories, but their classification is quite confusing. Here are some of them:
More images are to be found in other categories, but their classification is quite confusing. Here are some of them:
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Botany Botany]. Many subcategories.
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Botany botany]. Many subcategories.
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Fruit edible fruits]
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Fruit edible fruits]
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Fruits botanical fruits]
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Fruits botanical fruits]

Revision as of 14:58, 6 April 2012

Free of rights sources

Many illustrations are available on Wikipedia Commons. Illustrations from historical books can be searched at the category Botany books. To use them in Pl@ntUse, simply paste the file name in the target page. If it works, this means that the file has already been upoladed on Openmedia. If it doesn't work, you wil have to download it from Commons and upload it to Openmedia.

The list below gives the categories with the greatest numeber if images. Unforunately, it seems that nobody has attempted to categorize images by their scientific name. So it may be better to search in botanical pages fo Wikipedia in various languages, as authors may have chosen different images.

More images are to be found in other categories, but their classification is quite confusing. Here are some of them: